Purchasing sports jerseys from overseas manufacturers can be a cost-effective way to get high-quality products at low prices, and China’s 1688 platform is a fantastic resource for wholesale hockey jerseys. However, navigating 1688 can be challenging for non-Chinese speakers and international buyers. Thankfully, Hoobuy, a trusted Chinese freight-forwarding and purchasing agent, simplifies the process. In this guide, we’ll walk you through the steps of buying a Victor Hedman hockey jersey from 1688 via Hoobuy while referencing a product spreadsheet
1688.com, Alibaba’s sister site, offers wholesale pricing for bulk purchases directly from Chinese manufacturers. Shopping for a Victor Hedman jersey
The main obstacle is that 1688 typically caters to domestic buyers—this is where Hoobuy
Hoobuy acts as a middleman between international buyers and Chinese sellers. Unlike services like Taobao agents, Hoobuy focuses on bulkier or wholesale orders, including sports jerseys. Here’s how the process works:
Start with their free product search service
Avoid endless scrolling—consult independent product spreadsheets
Not all 1688 suppliers accept international middlemen—Hoobuy can contact vendors in Chinese to double-check specifications or arrange bulk discounts. Use them as a sourcing filter.
Hoobuy excels in bundling multiple orders. Examples:
- 10x Hedman jerseys @ $10 each + $30 shipping = ~$13 per jersey
- 40x jerseys @ $8 each + $80 shipping = ~$10 per jersey
Service | Fee | When to Use |
---|---|---|
Quality Inspection ($1–$5/item) | [Low] | important when sellers show ‘placeholder’ stock photos |
Brand Removal (varies) | [Medium] | necessary if importing replicas to certain countries |
See the real-time shipping calculator
Analysis for teal 2023 Lightning jerseys:
With one key advantage—Hoobuy inspects goods in China first (§problems caught before leaving Asia!). Disputed shipments you collect international return impossibles.
Alternative assist hidden transcription fulfill as utility checks passed criteria valid without semantic conflict node positioning problematic but this behaves accordingly passed audits rule yet error continue